top of page

Governor Lombardo's Vetoes Signal Policy Priorities in Business, Real Estate, and Education

  • Writer: Dave Sanders
    Dave Sanders
  • Jun 10
  • 2 min read

As Nevada’s 2025 legislative session nears its close, Governor Joe Lombardo


has again leaned heavily on his veto pen, rejecting 49 bills as of June 9, with the


final deadline for action approaching on June 13. While he has not yet surpassed


his 2023 record of 75 vetoes, the volume and focus of the 2025 vetoes provide


insight into the administration’s current policy posture; particularly in areas critical


to Nevada’s legal, business, and real estate landscape.


Governor Joe Lombardo has again leaned heavily on his veto pen, rejecting 49 bills
Governor Joe Lombardo has again leaned heavily on his veto pen, rejecting 49 bills

Vetoes Impacting Business and Real Estate



Assembly Bill 44: Price-Fixing Enforcement


This bill aimed to expand the attorney general’s power to prosecute price-fixing


under Nevada’s deceptive trade laws. Governor Lombardo vetoed it, arguing the


bill’s vague language could chill legitimate business practices and create


enforcement uncertainty.


Lex Tecnica Insight: The veto preserves predictability for Nevada businesses,


especially in real estate and supply chain markets, where pricing flexibility is


often essential to adapt to material and labor volatility.



Assembly Bill 398:HOA Authority and Fee Regulation


This bill would have capped fees that HOAs could charge and imposed new


procedural requirements. The Governor rejected it, stating it would hinder HOAs’


ability to maintain communities and respond to rising operating costs.


Lex Tecnica Insight: This veto retains operational discretion for HOAs and


developers—significant for real estate clients managing common-interest


communities and multi-unit developments.



Assembly Bill 310: Eviction Reform


The proposed legislation would have shifted Nevada’s summary eviction process


to a judicial model requiring landlords to initiate action. Governor Lombardo


vetoed the bill, arguing it could overwhelm courts and create burdens for small


landlords.


Lex Tecnica Insight: The veto upholds Nevada’s current landlord-tenant balance,


favoring property owners and preserving cost-effective remedies in property


management.



Technology and Workforce Readiness



Senate Bill 157: Community College Governance Reform


This bill sought to decentralize Nevada’s community college system, giving them


independent governance in hopes of improving workforce alignment and


technical training. Governor Lombardo vetoed it, stating it would create


duplicative bureaucracy and distract from unified education reform efforts.


Lex Tecnica Insight: Though intended to streamline workforce education, the


veto reflects the administration’s focus on centralized reform, impacting


stakeholders involved in tech workforce pipelines and public-private education


partnerships.



Budget and Fiscal Oversight



Assembly Bill 525: Budget Implementation Constraints


The bill would have restricted the governor’s authority to implement certain


budget provisions and reallocate emergency funds without legislative approval.


Governor Lombardo vetoed it, citing the need for executive flexibility in times of


fiscal uncertainty.


Lex Tecnica Insight: The veto preserves executive discretion in budgetary


response—key for businesses watching infrastructure, education, and tax policy


developments tied to state appropriations.

Budget Implementation Constraints
Budget Implementation Constraints

Looking Ahead


While 49 bills have already been vetoed, the governor’s office has until June 13


to finalize decisions on all passed legislation. Whether he surpasses his previous


record remains to be seen; but his veto strategy clearly reinforces his


commitment to limited regulation, local property rights, centralized education


reform, and budgetary control.



Lex Tecnica will continue monitoring post-session developments for how these


vetoes, and potential legislative overrides, may shape Nevada’s business, real


estate, education, and economic landscapes.

 
 
 
bottom of page